Controversy of the Pacifica Forum

In a serial publication of recent events, The Pacifica gathering has been brought to the tutelage of the public. This forum has been active for all over 10 years and has had no other complaints until now. With all the controversy, the headspring of whether the Pacifica meeting place should be obstreperously to stay on campus has been on many peoples minds. One issue should non be grounds to pip an established group from campus. The Pacifica Forum should continue to be allowed on campus because it promotes important polemic discussions. The Pacifica Forum debate blew up when a swastika was painted on the LGBTQTAs front door. Although the culprit for this act of nauseate has non been established, many choose to doom the Pacifica forum. The reason this conclusion is bony is because recently the forum has been inviting abhor speech utterers to come and rebuke to the forum. One of these speakers includes a Neo-Nazi final solution denier. The question of whether a speake r with such controversial views should be able to perform on campus is currently at debate. The Pacifica forum was started by Orval Etter in 1994 as a place where controversial ideas about war and cessation militarism and pacifism, violence and non-violence. The forum has certain the reputation that many of its members resemblingwise harbor similar ideas to about of the speakers. \nAlthough the Pacifica Forum may exasperate many University of Oregon students and officials, the forum itself is not actually breach any rules. Bringing in multiple known hate speakers isnt necessarily a bad thing considering the beliefs of the hateful individuals arent usually discussed or analyzed. I personally define the Pacifica Forum to be a positive campus influence because without the forum, issues like hate and neo-Nazism would be ignored entirely. Im not saying that the forum is a good thing in its entirety, but it has a bend of redeeming qualities that I feel far outweigh the damagin g qualities. The forum has recently b...