Freakonomics vs. the Tipping Point

After reading information on the tipping focalize and freakonomics, I have found NO correlation at ALL. These views be so totally antithetic that they atomic number 18 like crude oil and vinegar. In the passage Levitt believes that divulgecry dropped in the 1990s because of roe vs. walk (the heavyization of abortion).Levitt believes that poor domain should abort their unwanted kids, if this takes bottom crime will decrease. The unwanted children will eventually stop into criminals and raise the crime rate. I personally believe this is so far from the truth. I am from a poor family who was raised in the projects; we are eminent hard working people who strive for greatness. This is America, so everyone has the mature to the first amendment Freedom of dialect. On the different upset Malcolm Gladwell has a totally different view of crime decreases. His view depicts crime decreasing delinquent to more Police power, Gladwell believes if in that location are more natural law that people would come out less crime. I agree, if there are more legal philosophy policeling crime would be very minimal.

I really agree with both sides, you would have less crime if unwanted children are aborted and you would have less crime if police patrol more. Works Consulted Works Cited A smaller point to also consider: Gladwell left out one other study reason that, according to Levitts research, crime did dismount to happen in the 1990?s: the waning of the violent crack trade. (Thanks to Darren Rovell for pointing out the Gladwell blog.) Gladwell, Malcolm. Freakonomics. Freakonomics. Ma lcolm Gladwell, n.d. Web. 1 Apr. 2011.If you! want to get a respectable essay, rewrite it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper